\n<\/p>\n
There are a couple of moments in The Invisible Man that will jolt you out of your seat, and which will make you think twice before buying long kitchen knives. And the film is just about saved by Moss\u2019s committed performance: she makes Cecilia such a nervous wreck \u2013 alternately furiously frantic and drained to the point of catatonia \u2013 that you can understand why the other characters assume she is paranoid. But The Invisible Man is never as effective as you wish it would be. As inspired as some of Whannell\u2019s ideas may be, it feels as if he shot an early draft of the script, with Post-It notes on every page indicating where the details had to be fleshed out later, and where the plot holes had to be plugged.<\/p>\n
The film is annoyingly vague on whether Adrian is a control freak, or whether he is so lackadaisical that anyone can wander into his top-secret laboratory. In fact, we learn so little about him in general that he never haunts us as he haunts Cecilia. (Even if a villain is invisible, it can help to have a mental picture of him.) Meanwhile, the dialogue doles out information in the most mechanical way, so it\u2019s not unusual for one character to announce to another: \u201cYou have an important job interview tomorrow.\u201d Even the clothing is drably functional. How do we know that Cecilia studied architecture at Cal Poly? Because she has \u2018Cal Poly Architecture\u2019 emblazoned on her sweatshirt. Worst of all, Whannell hasn\u2019t conjured up any invisibility tricks that haven\u2019t been seen in previous versions of the story. You can\u2019t help but feel that a sadist of Adrian\u2019s twisted genius could have thought of some more petrifying pranks than pulling Cecilia\u2019s bedspread onto the floor. This invisible man doesn\u2019t have much vision.<\/p>\n
Maybe I\u2019m expecting too much of a low-budget chiller. Five years ago, Universal had planned to reboot The Invisible Man as an action-adventure blockbuster starring Johnny Depp, but when they went down that road with another of their classic monsters, they ended up with The Mummy<\/a>, one of Tom Cruise\u2019s few big-screen disasters. Sensibly, the studio\u2019s executives opted for a cheaper take on The Invisible Man, and that\u2019s where Whannell came in. The co-writer of the Saw and Insidious series, he specialises in cut-price ghost-train rides, and if he had got through this one in 90 minutes, it might have been just as spookily enjoyable as his others. But over the course of two hours, the flaws are all too visible. And at a time when small-scale horror movies can be as stunning as A Quiet Place and Get Out, a film as perfunctory as The Invisible Man feels insulting. Move along: there\u2019s nothing to see here.<\/p>\n \u2605\u2605\u2606\u2606\u2606<\/p>\n Love film? Join\u00a0<\/em>BBC Culture Film Club<\/em><\/strong><\/a>\u00a0on Facebook, a community for film fanatics all over the world.<\/em><\/p>\n If you would like to comment on this story or anything else you have seen on BBC Culture, head over to our\u00a0<\/em>Facebook<\/strong><\/em><\/a>\u00a0page or message us on<\/em>\u00a0Twitter<\/strong><\/em><\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n And if you liked this story,\u00a0<\/em>sign up for the weekly bbc.com features newsletter<\/em><\/strong><\/a>, called The Essential List. A handpicked selection of stories from BBC Future, Culture, Worklife and Travel, delivered to your inbox every Friday.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n