\n
However big the headline change in the vote between the past two elections, drill down into two demographic pockets of Britain and you find staggering shifts.<\/b><\/p>\n
It all centres around the relationships between the Labour Party and not just Muslim voters, but Jewish voters too.<\/p>\n
It leaves a party in government that has made progress in winning back trust among people from one faith group while suddenly finding itself with a lot of work to do to win back many members of the other.<\/p>\n
The drop in the Labour vote share among British Muslims between 2019 and 2024 very obviously played out in several constituencies. This happened most dramatically in Leicester South, with a Muslim population close to 30%, where Shadow Paymaster General Jon Ashworth lost his seat to independent Shockat Adam.<\/p>\n
In the seat of Dewsbury and Batley, in Birmingham Perry Barr and in Blackburn, there were wins for independents in what had been safe Labour seats with large numbers of Muslim voters.<\/p>\n
In places like Bradford West and the seat of Bethnal Green and Stepney in east London, sitting Labour MPs clung on with startling reductions in their majorities.<\/p>\n
Mish Rahman, from Wolverhampton, is not just any Muslim voter. He currently sits on the National Executive Committee (NEC) of the Labour Party, a body of fewer than 40 members.<\/p>\n
He is furious with the party\u2019s response to the killing of tens of thousands of civilians in Gaza and the humanitarian crisis there.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n
Getty Images<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\nJonathan Ashworth was the most high-profile victim of a backlash against Labour’s stance on Gaza in seats with a high number of Muslim voters<\/figcaption><\/p>\n<\/figure>\n\n
\u201cIn my community it has got to the point where I am now embarrassed about my affiliation with Labour,\u201d he says.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt was hard even to tell members of my own extended family to go and knock on doors to tell people to vote for a party that originally gave Israel carte blanche in its response to the horrific 7 October attacks,\u201d says Mr Rahman.<\/p>\n
He lays the blame for the decline in Muslim voting for Labour squarely at the door of the Labour leader.<\/p>\n
Sir Keir Starmer was criticised by many in his party, including councillors, for an interview with LBC in October in which he suggested that Israel \u201chad the right\u201d to withhold power and water in Gaza. His spokesman subsequently suggested the Labour leader had only meant to say Israel had a general right to self-defence.<\/p>\n
Then when Labour MPs were told by the party leadership in November to abstain from voting on an SNP-led motion calling for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, some Labour councillors resigned and, for many Muslims, trust in their Labour MP was lost.<\/p>\n
Faith communities are far from homogenous, of course. There are myriad factors that govern how a person will cast their vote, but faith does throw up a unique set of considerations that plays out in broad voting patterns.<\/p>\n
Muslims are estimated to form around 6.5% of the population of England and Wales, with around 2% in Scotland and 1% in Northern Ireland.<\/p>\n
Well over 80% of Muslims are believed to have voted for Labour in 2019. Research just ahead of the 2024 election suggested that had dropped nationally by up to 20 percentage points, and in some constituencies the Muslim vote for Labour clearly fell further.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n
\n
The contrast with Jewish voting data could not be more stark. In 2019, the proportion of British Jews (about 0.5% of the population) who voted for a Labour Party led by Jeremy Corbyn is thought to have collapsed to just single figures. Research suggests that figure could have climbed back to above 40%.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat we have seen is a huge bounce-back for Labour among Jewish voters,\u201d says Adam Langleben, who was until recently the national secretary of the Jewish Labour Movement.<\/p>\n
Mr Langleben, a former Labour councillor and now director of Progressive Britain (formerly Progress), points to Labour wins in London in the Finchley and Golders Green seat and also Hendon as well as Bury South in Greater Manchester, all constituencies with large Jewish populations.<\/p>\n
\u201cJewish voters returning to the party has undoubtedly delivered seats to the Labour Party,\u201d says Mr Langleben.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou don\u2019t need a majority of Jewish voters to win in these constituencies, but you also can\u2019t only have 7% of them voting for you and expect to win,\u201d he says.<\/p>\n
Mr Langleben had been a senior member of the Jewish Labour Movement but was one of many Jewish members of the party to give up their membership during the Corbyn era. When he left in 2019, he said it was on account of the party being \u201cled by antisemites\u201d, an accusation always strongly denied by those leading the party at the time.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt was a situation that was all-consuming. I would be canvassing for the Labour Party in a Jewish area and had people in tears on the doorstep saying there was no way they could vote for Jeremy Corbyn, and I was trying to juggle this huge personal tension,\u201d he says.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n
Getty Images<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\nAdam Langleben (far left, at the back) quit Labour while Jeremy Corbyn was leader<\/figcaption><\/p>\n<\/figure>\n\n
Mr Langleben puts Mr Corbyn\u2019s problems down to both a lack of personal reflection about who he was associating with, and what he says was the party\u2019s inability to deal with extreme elements in its base and tolerance of the use of antisemitic tropes.<\/p>\n
\u201cFrom day one, Keir Starmer pledged to work with the Jewish community to try to deal with the issues inside the Labour Party. For him, fixing what went wrong was a personal mission,\u201d he says.<\/p>\n
But given that Keir Starmer supported Jeremy Corbyn throughout his leadership, Jewish voters at hustings in synagogues and community centres around the country had been grilling Labour candidates as to why they should trust the current leader now.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe Jewish vote is now split and that\u2019s how it should be. The results show there wasn\u2019t a dominant party of choice, and that\u2019s healthy, and still represents a huge transformation for Labour,\u201d says Mr Langleben.<\/p>\n
So while mistrust clearly still remains, what is responsible for the transformation in the perception of the Labour Party among some British Jews?<\/p>\n
The fact that the current leadership\u2019s criticism of Israel\u2019s response to the 7 October attacks has been more tempered than it may have been under the previous leadership may have contributed.<\/p>\n
But long before that, Mr Langleben cites a change in the way complaints around \u201cprotected characteristics\u201d like faith are dealt with by the party, but also refers to one thing that convinced him he was right to re-join the party.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe fundamental moment was Jeremy Corbyn being suspended from the Labour Party and then subsequently having the whip removed, because it showed Keir Starmer\u2019s determination and his willingness to take on parts of the party that previously he had not been willing to take on,\u201d he says.<\/p>\n
Jeremy Corbyn\u2019s suspension is precisely identified by Mr Rahman too as the first major showdown between different wings of the party under Keir Starmer.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n
Harry Rose<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\nMish Rahman blames the current Labour leadership for many Muslims abandoning the party<\/figcaption><\/p>\n<\/figure>\n\n
Except, as someone who had been inspired by Mr Corbyn from the days of Stop the War protests in the lead-up to the UK-backed invasion of Iraq in 2003, Mr Rahman was on the other side, saying that was the moment when the alarm bells started ringing for him that the party leaders were not safeguarding the values he believed in.<\/p>\n
Mr Rahman does not see the party\u2019s anti-Muslim slant as being limited to its response to events in Gaza. He does not question there have been serious cases of antisemitism but does not believe all accusations of racism are treated equally.<\/p>\n
\u201cThere is a clear hierarchy of racism in the Labour Party. Some instances of racism, including Islamophobia, aren’t taken as seriously as they should,\u201d he says.<\/p>\n
Mr Rahman cites the case of Trevor Phillips, the former chair of the EHRC, who was suspended for alleged Islamophobia.<\/p>\n
Mr Phillips had said British Muslims were \u201ca nation within a nation\u201d and previously that their opinion was \u201csome distance away from the centre of gravity of everybody else\u2019s\u201d, though later he suggested this had not necessarily been meant as a criticism.<\/p>\n
Mr Phillips was readmitted to the party in 2021 without it going to a panel inquiry.<\/p>\n
Mr Rahman, like many other Muslims, also points to Keir Starmer\u2019s own comments, like those made in a Sun livestream during the election campaign, when he talked of migrants being sent back to the countries they came from.<\/p>\n
\u201cAt the moment, people coming from countries like Bangladesh are not being removed because they\u2019re not being processed,\u201d the Labour leader said.<\/p>\n
\u201cCan you imagine the Labour Party saying that about people of any other ethnicity? Saying they’re going to deport people to Israel or Ukraine or Hong Kong? It wouldn\u2019t happen and neither should it,\u201d says Mr Rahman.<\/p>\n
Such is his disenchantment with Labour\u2019s response that, coupled with wider concerns regarding the treatment of Muslims, he lays a serious charge against the party.<\/p>\n
\u201cI don\u2019t doubt for a minute that Labour is currently institutionally Islamophobic,\u201d says Mr Rahman.<\/p>\n
Mr Rahman wants to use his voice to call out hypocrisy in the party while in government, in the hope that it will learn what he says is a lesson of this election – that no voter can be taken for granted.<\/p>\n
Mr Rahman did give up his membership of the Labour Party once before, in protest at Tony Blair\u2019s role in the Iraq War.<\/p>\n
He, and other Muslims, felt persuaded to come back to the party in 2014 when the then-leader Ed Miliband condemned the scale of an Israeli operation in Gaza and the hundreds of civilian deaths.<\/p>\n
Once again, at the same moment, Mr Langleben was seeing things very differently on the doorsteps of Jewish voters.<\/p>\n
Even though Mr Miliband was himself Jewish, it was a time when polls were showing a rapid decline in Jewish support for Labour, particularly when the party\u2019s 2015 manifesto talked about a parliamentary vote to recognise a Palestinian state.<\/p>\n
\u201cThere were sometimes quite horrible conversations with Jewish voters who really cared about the issue of Israel,\u201d says Mr Langleben.<\/p>\n
\u201cPeople in 2015 were accusing the Labour Party of antisemitism, but I think it fundamentally misread what antisemitism is. Then, it was a primarily about a foreign policy issue, Israel. That changed by 2019 when conversations were around a particular strain of far-left anti-Jewish racism,\u201d says Mr Langleben.<\/p>\n
For some of those supportive of the Corbyn-era leadership, that sense that criticism of Israel was being conflated with antisemitism was also something they felt occurred while he was leader.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n
Getty Images<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\nKeir Starmer has worked to rebuild trust with Jewish voters who had abandoned Labour<\/figcaption><\/p>\n<\/figure>\n\n
The Hamas attacks of the 7 October 2023 happened during the week of the Labour Party conference and Mr Langleben says it was strange to see normal political business go on while he and other Jewish delegates were going through a difficult and upsetting period.<\/p>\n
Ultimately, Mr Langleben says he has been pleased with the way Keir Starmer has handled the crisis, seeing it as Labour realigning itself with UK and US government policy on Israel.<\/p>\n
This is precisely why during this election campaign, Mr Rahman had the hardest conversations on the doorsteps of Muslim voters he had ever had, with anger and frustration boiling over about Israel\u2019s actions in Gaza.<\/p>\n
\u201cIf you look back at the history of the relationship between our communities and the Labour Party, it’s always been a one-sided affair of loyalty from our communities,\u201d Mr Rahman says. The Labour Party\u2019s roots in his own family go back to his grandfather, who was a factory worker in the 1950s and 60s. Mr Rahman talks of feeling \u201cbetrayed\u201d.<\/p>\n
Gaza of course is not just a Muslim issue, and not all Muslims ranked it is one of the key considerations on which they voted, but it had an impact.<\/p>\n
Similarly, Israel policy is not necessarily a major consideration for all Jewish voters, and even for those for whom it is, there are those who are highly critical of the Israeli government and are at odds with the response of Labour under Starmer.<\/p>\n
But while over the decades the Jewish vote has swung between the two main parties broadly in line with the general population, it would appear that if one puts to one side all of the rows over antisemitism, the party\u2019s outlook on Israel does impact voting intention.<\/p>\n
Separately, both Mish Rahman and Adam Langleben are very clear that their accusations of discrimination levelled at the party in different eras do not just relate to party policy on the Middle East.<\/p>\n
Even if everyone can be satisfied that accusations of discrimination are dealt with equally, such are the modern tensions around Middle East policy that political parties may struggle to find a position that does not alienate some members of one of these faith communities.<\/p>\n
Labour has achieved much in winning back the levels of Jewish voters it has, but it has also left huge swathes of loyal Muslim voters in Britain feeling politically adrift, and large swings in culture and policy over recent years leave many in each community needing convincing of the true nature of the party.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n