Let’s address the issue of choking. This was categorically not a choke.

How could it be when only the most one-eyed South African supporter would not have given their team anything more than a puncher’s chance?

India are, by some distance, the best white-ball side on the planet. Were it not for their capitulation in the 50-over final against Australia last year, they would hold both limited-overs trophies.

Bumrah is the best all-format bowler in the world, possibly the best of all time. Their spinners have run through batting line-ups at will. Virat Kohli is one of the greatest to ever hold a bat.

There is no shame in losing to this outfit. Calling this a choke is both inaccurate and lazy.

There will be questions over Jansen’s position at number seven, arguably one place too high. But his bowling was a key feature of South Africa’s run to the final.

There will be questions over Klaasen’s dismissal that sparked the collapse, but one could just as easily focus on Hardik Pandya’s cleverly disguised slower ball that drew the edge.

There will be questions over Miller’s inability to hit a full toss for six but that is only a consequence of one of the greatest catches of all time.

There will be questions over De Kock’s poor shot that picked out the boundary rider and why Maharaj kept the strike at the end of the 18th over. That’s the thing about tight games. There are always question to ask.

Many respected journalists and commentators have already asked if this defeat should be included in the pantheon of South Africa chokes. Some have already made their mind up.

It’s a misguided question with an inaccurate conclusion.

The only question that should concern the Proteas is the direction of travel of a side that went toe-to-toe with a giant of world cricket and almost came out on top.

Where do they go from here? Despite the pain, the outlook is positive.